Access Keywords in Object oriented concept in C Language

base -> Access the members of the base class.
this -> Refer to the current object for which a method is called.

The base keyword is used to access members of the base class from within a derived class:
Call a method on the base class that has been overridden by another method. Specify which base-class constructor should be called when creating instances of the derived class. A base class access is permitted only in a constructor, an instance method, or an instance property accessor.

In following example, both the base class, Person, and the derived class, Employee, have a method named Getinfo. By using the base keyword, it is possible to call the Getinfo method on the base class, from within the derived class.

// Accessing base class members

using System;
public class Person
{
protected string ssn = "444-55-6666";
protected string name = "John L. Malgraine";
public virtual void GetInfo()
{
Console.WriteLine("Name: {0}", name);
Console.WriteLine("SSN: {0}", ssn);
}
}
class Employee: Person
{
public string id = "ABC567EFG";
public override void GetInfo()
{
// Calling the base class GetInfo method:
base.GetInfo();
Console.WriteLine("Employee ID: {0}", id);
}
}
class TestClass
{
public static void Main()
{
Employee E = new Employee();
E.GetInfo();
}
}

Output
Name: John L. Malgraine
SSN: 444-55-6666
Employee ID: ABC567EFG

Base class constructors can be called from derived classes. To call a base class constructor, use the base() constructor reference. This is desirable when it's necessary to initialize a base class appropriately.

Here's an example that shows the derived class constructor with an address parameter:

abstract public class Contact
{
private string address;
public Contact(string b_address)
{
this.address = b_address;
}
}
public class Customer : Contact
{
public Customer(string c_address) : base(C_address)
{
}
}

In this code, the Customer class does not have an address, so it passes the parameter to its base class constructor by adding a colon and the base keyword with the parameter to its declaration. This calls the Contact constructor with the address parameter, where the address field in Contact is initialized.

One more example which shows how base-class constructor is called when creating instances of a derived class:

using System;
public class MyBase
{
int num;
public MyBase()
{
Console.WriteLine("In MyBase()");
}
public MyBase(int i)
{
num = i;
Console.WriteLine("in MyBase(int i)");
}
public int GetNum()
{
return num;
}
}
public class MyDerived : MyBase
{
static int i = 32;
// This constructor will call MyBase.MyBase()
public MyDerived(int ii) : base()
{
}
// This constructor will call MyBase.MyBase(int i)
public MyDerived() : base(i)
{
}
public static void Main()
{
MyDerived md = new MyDerived(); // calls public MyDerived() : base(i) and
// passes i=32 in base class
MyDerived md1 = new MyDerived(1); // call public MyDerived() : base(i)
}
}

Output
in MyBase(int i)
in MyBase()

The following example will not compile. It illustrates the effects of not including a default constructor in a class definition:

abstract public class Contact
{
private string address;
public Contact(string address)
{
this.address = address;
}
}
public class Customer : Contact
{
public Customer(string address)
{
}
}

In this example, the Customer constructor does not call the base class constructor. This is obviously a bug, since the address field will never be initialized.

When a class has no explicit constructor, the system assigns a default constructor. The default constructor automatically calls a default or parameterless base constructor. Here's an example of automatic default constructor generation that would occur for the preceding example:

public Customer() : Contact()
{
}

When a class does not declare any constructors, the code in this example is automatically generated. The default base class constructor is called implicitly when no derived class constructors are defined. Once a derived class constructor is defined, whether or not it has parameters, a default constructor will not be automatically defined, as the preceding code showed.